Stella McCartney: 3 posts

Stella McCartney L.I.L.Y. : Perfume Review

33333

Star rating: 5 stars–outstanding/potential classic, 4 stars–very good, 3 stars–adequate, 2 stars–disappointing, 1 star–poor.

Sometimes it seems to me that every floral note needs to be “modern,” because (fill in the blank with your favorite blossom) is “a fusty, old-fashioned flower suitable only for maiden aunts and grandmothers.”  When you get your fusty flower back, it feels like something that has gone through several wash cycles and emerged squeaky clean and limpid.  As I read the aforementioned quote by Stella McCartney about her desire to modernize lily of the valley for her new signature fragrance L.I.L.Y., I wondered what the outcome would be.  My qualm with most modern lily of the valley fragrances is that they smell of laundry products—lily of the valley aroma-materials are popular in functional perfumery—not that they are old-fashioned.

Continue reading →

Stella McCartney Stella in Two Peony and Amber : Perfume Review

22222

Stella_in_two_amber

Star rating: 5 stars–outstanding/potential classic, 4 stars–very good, 3 stars–adequate, 2 stars–disappointing, 1 star–poor.

Although rose is often seen as dowdy and old-fashioned, the perfumer Jacques Cavallier set the silky rose petals on the transparent ambery base and rendered the flower crisp and spicy in his fragrance for Stella McCartney. Rose Absolute followed the original, and it was still exciting, being darker, richer and warmer. Then there were a few summer limited editions, Stella Sheer, which offered a lighter take on the rose-amber marriage. Now, Stella in Two takes inspiration from the success of the original creation by offering yet another Stella variation. This time, Stella can be bought in two parts, Peony and Amber. Is it possible to stretch the concept too far? As I have discovered, yes. I was won over by the retro charm of the original, loved the richness of Rose Absolute and enjoyed the freshness of Stella Sheer. Now, I feel ready to explore something new. ….

Continue reading →

Stella McCartney Stella : Fragrance Review

44444

Stella

Star rating: 5 stars–outstanding/potential classic, 4 stars–very good, 3 stars–adequate, 2 stars–disappointing, 1 star–poor.

Roses love sunshine, which coaxes their buds to unfold in layers of silky petals and to release aromas ranging from lemony tea to musky honey. Rose fragrances likewise follow this dictum, blooming with abandon on warm skin. For this reason, as soon as the temperatures begin to increase and pleasant spring warmth turns into sweltering summer heat, a coterie of rose fragrances begins to dominate my repertoire—the gorgeous opulence of Lancôme Mille et Une Rôse (formerly, 2000 et Une Rôse), the lemony sparkle of Les Parfums de Rosine Un Zest de Rose, the dark seduction of Frédéric Malle Une Rose, and the ambery rose velvet of Stella McCartney. …

Continue reading →

From the Archives

Latest Comments

  • Peter in Recommend Me a Perfume : June 2020: A hui hou! July 4, 2020 at 5:17pm

  • Peter in Recommend Me a Perfume : June 2020: Aloha Judith T, I hope you have a photo of yourself wearing your fairy dress. We love our Mums! I have artwork from my Mother, my Tutus (Grandparents), my twin… July 4, 2020 at 5:16pm

  • Peter in Recommend Me a Perfume : June 2020: Aloha limegreen. I just received my (7) 3ml Voile de Parfum NON-alcohol samples from DSH. I had to try “your” Tubereuse first. I love it! A beautiful floral with a… July 4, 2020 at 5:01pm

  • OperaFan in 6 Luminous Musk Perfumes: I never knew Lovely is a musk perfume, always thought it was classified a chypre. I guess I should try it especially since it can be had for a song.… July 4, 2020 at 4:14pm

Latest Tweets

Design by cre8d
© Copyright 2005-2020 Bois de Jasmin. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy